0%

Mymic

Let's Talk

Mymic
Developed by
IAIAI Technologies

Independent Artists Informing Artificial Intelligence


about

Advanced Vocal DNA Protection for Artists

By using sophisticated biometric analysis techniques, Mymic examines the intricate patterns of an individual’s voice, capturing features such as tone, pitch, cadence and other subtle vocal signatures that are distinct to each person.

The Mymic system is a cutting edge platform designed to analyse the unique characteristics of artists voices, generating precise and individualised vocal DNA profiles. These profiles are then securely stored in a comprehensive repository, ensuring that the vocal identity of each artist is protected from unauthorised cloning, exploitation or misuse.

By using sophisticated biometric analysis techniques, Mymic examines the intricate patterns of an individual’s voice, capturing features such as tone, pitch, cadence and other subtle vocal signatures that are distinct to each person.

These digital vocal DNA profiles serve as a powerful mechanism for a variety of applications, including voice authentication, copyright protection and forensic analysis. In the event of an infringement, Mymic enables the identification and verification of the original voice, offering a reliable means of tracing the unauthorised use of a persons voice. Mymic provides an essential tool for defending against voice impersonation and ensuring the integrity of voice cloning in the age of AI.

In addition to its copyright protection capabilities, Mymic is also a powerful voice cloning technology that enables artists to create highly accurate digital replicas of their own voices. The system’s biometric analysis allows for precise replication that maintains the authenticity of the artist’s voice, empowering artists to explore new creative possibilities while also playing a key role in protecting their intellectual property at a time when voice cloning has become the norm.

01
05
Human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright.
Federal Judge Beryl Howell, United States Federal District Court for the District of Columbia
It is the choice of the creator and the rightsholder if and how to allow the use of their intellectual property. This basic principle relating to consent should not be undermined.
Tom Kiehl Interim Chief Executive UK Music, letter to Prime Minister, 10 Downing Street, London Oct 30th 2023
The U.S. Copyright Office was correct in denying copyright protections to a work that was created entirely without human involvement.
Federal Judge Beryl A. Howell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
In the case where a work has been generated by an artificial intelligence system, it is imperative to affix the mention "work generated by AI" as well as to insert the name of the authors of the works that allowed to achieve such a work.
PROPOSED LAW, Article L. 121-2 of the Intellectual Property Code, France Sept 12th 2023.